xenutv vs scientologytv

I saw this in a comment on gawker about the scientology channel, i dont know if it anywhere else if it is just delete this but it makes a MAJOR point.

Oh gee, this expensive channel fits nicely on the heels of Youtube banning scientology's biggest critic's account! The Xenutv1 account was deleted recently for copyright rules...because he had a former account that posted a clip from the Colbert Report show, therefore he was not allowed to open a new account, so they deleted it for Terms Of Service TOS violations.

Now, guess what? The Church of Scientology had a previous account which was permanently banned due to ToS violations (posted videos targeting individuals and broadcasting their personal information [picture, name, location, alleged alias]).

According to Youtube's strict ruleset, the "Church" is not allowed to have a second account ("channel"). This rule was made VERRRRY CLEAR by Youtube when they banned Mark Bunker's account (XenuTV1).

Anyone else care to comment on this?

Regardless of what you think of either channel, this is blatant, targeted Internet Censorship.

Feel free to send your comments to:

editor@youtube.com

If anyone has other contact emails, please post them.

Or go here to report a complaint to youtube under their privacy comlaint form, since it was for this reason $cientology violated their TOS by publishing videos of the anti-scientology group Anonymous' members, and displaying their names and personal information for all to see.

[www.google.com]

I saw a similar comment here: Scientology Advertises YouTube Channel In Bid To Boost Low Ratings - Silicon Alley Insider

We are late to the party, simpleton :(

New violator! Notify Youtube!

GlossLip With Enough Money, You Can Circumvent YouTube’s TOS On Banned Accounts

anyone see this?

I've just read it. We should help spread the article far and wide.